Tag Archives: Bush

Culling the Herd

This blog has been silent of late, due, in no small measure to my own laziness, but also and more significantly by my ennui about all things political. Public reactions to the issues of the day and the coverage of the media have left me stunned silent and unable to articulate a response. I cannot grasp how an intelligent person can think the way that so many people seem to be thinking lately. I cannot follow how rational minds can accept the overreach of the judiciary and the executive branches of government without so much as an outcry about checks and balances. But before I go completely into rant mode, I do want to answer a political question my niece asked me in response to a comment I made on a friend’s Facebook post.

My pastor, Randy White, wrote a blog in which he analyzed the Fox news republican “debate.” I put that in quotes because it was not so much a debate as an attempt by Fox to rank the candidates. I won’t spell out Randy’s entire post here, but suffice to say he and I agreed on almost every point. This is a lot of why he has been my pastor for the past 9 years. He’s leaving the church now and I am very upset about it.

The debates are supposed to help the public find a candidate to support. This should allow the field of candidates be winnowed down to a reasonable number. We started the campaign season with a record seventeen republicans; too many to appear on one stage at the same time. Fox divided them up according to their polling numbers, which is no small statement about their viability as a candidate.

The candidates I feel have a shot:

Ted Cruz: He’s a long shot, but it is not outside the realm of possibility that he could pull off the nomination with some money and a good CM.

Mike Huckabee: One of the best speakers in the field. He communicates well and he has a lot of good ideas. His biggest weakness in the election is his strongest asset to his base: his faith. As an ordained minister, a lot of people are not comfortable with someone so strong in his faith leading the country, which is a shame. We need more like him.

Marco Rubio: Young, energetic and Latino. I differ from Randy on this one. The pundits like him and they love to categorize him as the republican’s best hope for relevance in the future. His youth may work against him unless he gets a crack team on his campaign. My biggest problem with him is his support for amnesty for illegal aliens.

Jeb Bush: Pros: Experience, name recognition, good speaker. Cons: Name recognition, waffler, past support for Planned Parenthood. I’m not a big fan of the younger Bush, and a lot of moderates are similarly unimpressed. Liberals will shut him down out of spite for GW’s administration. He has the best chance, however, of sustaining a campaign thanks to the established power base within the party.

Kasich: Was on the stage as a nod to Ohio only. He had some good responses to the questions he was soft-pitched, but he hasn’t spelled out his policy platform yet, aside from commenting on the media issues of immigration and abortion. He doesn’t have enough wide-spread support to maintain a campaign.

Rand Paul: The hothead. A lot of bluster and good interchange between him and Trump and Bush. Makes for good television, but that’s all he’s good for. He reminds me of the one guy hollering at the back of a crowd that desperately wants him to shut up, even if they know he’s right. I don’t see him riding it out until the end. He doesn’t have a presidential bearing.

Ben Carson: I loved his responses and I love his message. If no one had to actually hear him say it, he would go a long way. As it is, he looked unsteady on the stage, pale, almost sickly and tentative in his tone. He did not look presidential, even though he had some of the best things to say. If he gets an image consultant, he may last it out, otherwise not.

Donald Trump: I may be alone on this, but I hope not. Trump is NOT a republican candidate. Trump is on the Clinton campaign. His mission is to split the vote, and he is well on his way to doing so. Allow me to elucidate.

The current Democratic Party contest consists of Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton. Sanders is an admitted socialist running as a democrat (semantics, I know, since they have become one and the same) and not a genuine candidate. The party just has to have someone else to look like they are having a real primary since they have no incumbent. Hillary took a dive in ’08 so the party could elect the first black president in history with a proviso that she would be the candidate in ’16. There will be no other viable candidate on the democratic ticket unless Hillary gets convicted.

Now, the democrats are well aware that Obama has lost a lot of the moderate and independent voters that helped get him into office. Since those voters are up in the air, the only way to ensure Hillary gets elected is to prevent those independent and moderate voters from voting republican. The best way to do that is to give them an alternative: enter Donald Trump. Trump is spouting the republican battle cry like a seasoned general—almost like he actually believes it. Heck, I like what he’s saying. I agree with most of what he is saying. The problem is that I don’t think he actually believes what he is saying.

He won’t get the nomination. He will announce as an independent. He will do his best to keep the support he drums up through the republican primary, thereby weakening the republican candidate’s support. If you do not want Hillary in the Whitehouse, do not support Trump.

The second tier candidates had a mini debate before the main show and none of those are likely to survive the first wave of cuts. Rick Perry’s campaign is already on the rocks financially. Fiorina has a lot going for her if she can get more exposure. If she can get her numbers up, she may ride it out. My biggest problem with her is her support of abortion as a “women’s health” issue. You will find that she won’t tow the party line on abortion and she will probably duck the issue the whole way through the campaign. I anticipate the campaign will be narrowed to ten before Thanksgiving, and four or five by Caucus time.

It is too early to pick a candidate now, however. Always use the whole primary period to research all the candidates and when voting time comes, then make your decision. Please do NOT rely solely on the media for this information. It would be akin to buying a car solely on the salesman’s pitch. Look the information up yourself.

Happy voting.

Leave a comment

Filed under Media, Politics, Society

Slick Times in the Gulf

This world is so full of life and nature that exists outside the realm of mankind, that to think we have even more than a smattering of knowledge of it all is the height of conceit, and to think we have any control of it is just plain idiotic. Sure, the industrial age heralded an unprecedented understanding about the natural sciences relative to what we knew before. Compared to the sum total of knowledge in the dark ages, we could be considered almost omniscient. But that is not really saying much. It is like saying that, compared to a newborn, a high school graduate is brilliant; but no one would assume that high school graduate is about to cure cancer or understand the behavior of tachyons. We are smarter sure, but we don’t know everything.

We don’t know enough to really understand what the gulf oil spill is going to do in the long run. No one could have even predicted the events that led up to the spill. Sure, one could argue that if “proper precautions” were taken, the crisis would never have happened. But that is really not true, especially when you remember that accidents happen no matter how many plans you put into place. You cannot plan for every eventuality. Perhaps if BP had drilled secondary vents, they could relieve the pressure on that line so less oil would leak into the gulf. But that would not have prevented the explosion. Maybe if they make a determination that the explosion was “preventable,” someone will step forward and admit wrongdoing. Not likely, but one can always hope. Either way, that determination will be erroneous. We can always second guess our outcomes, but hindsight is 20/20 and the only good it does is to give the public a scapegoat.

Who should take the blame for this? Obama and the socialists? It would be easy to blame them. Bush and the conservatives? Easier still for the liberals to blame them. But really, the fault lies with BP. Only with BP. No one else can claim fault (unless the explosion was the direct result of an eco- terrorist act) because no one else was involved. The public wants to roast someone on a spit about it. Whenever something goes wrong the first thing the public wants to do is to assign blame. This makes the public feel superior and gives them comfort in their moral superiority. Never mind that the main reason BP was drilling there was to feed the public’s appetite for energy.

Obama made a declaration in an interview yesterday that he was in talks with experts so he “knows whose butt to kick” about the disaster. There are all kinds of people clamoring for the government to take over the efforts to repair the pipe and stop the leak. That is the last thing anyone should want. Why would we want an institution that cannot even balance a budget, cannot secure our nation’s borders, cannot solve healthcare crisis and cannot meet the basic needs of the nation to even try to fix a leak in a 40-inch pipe a mile under the surface of the ocean? They could only make matters worse. It would be like a plumber trying to wire in a 220 volt circuit, or a baker trying to repair a hot water heater. These are not similar skill sets. Nothing good can come of the attempt. There is no geologist just waiting around the West Wing waiting for a project. The best minds that can work on this problem already are.

The only thing the government can do is drive BP to work harder. Fine them a billion dollars a day that the leak is spewing. Give them the proper incentive to get this problem fixed. But stop getting in the way. Everyone knows what is going on, we don’t need more coverage, we don’t need more politicians getting airtime clamoring for the administration to act, and we don’t need bureaucrats getting in the way of real experts.

No one knows how the spill will affect the gulf ecosystems in the long run. Sure, it will kill of thousands, perhaps millions, of animals. Sure it will poison the waters. But the oceans are huge and you may not know this, but raw crude oil has been leaking into the ocean since the dawn of time through naturally occurring fissures in the ocean floor. Perhaps not as rapidly as the oil well leak, but it gets there none the less. The ocean cleans itself. It is part of nature. Don’t ask me to explain how. I don’t know. And that is my point.


Filed under Media, Politics, Society